ÇáÎáíÌ Èíä ãÎÇáÈ ÇáÈäÊÇÛæä ...ÊÏÇÚíÇÊ ÓíÇÓíÉ ÎØíÑÉ áÇ ÊÎØÑ Úáì ÇáÈÇá - ßÇÙã ÝäÌÇä ÇáÍãÇãí
ÇáÎáíÌ Èíä ãÎÇáÈ ÇáÈäÊÇÛæä ...ÊÏÇÚíÇÊ ÓíÇÓíÉ ÎØíÑÉ áÇ ÊÎØÑ Úáì ÇáÈÇá


بقلم: ßÇÙã ÝäÌÇä ÇáÍãÇãí - 16-04-2015
ãÊÛíÑÇÊ ÓíÇÓíÉ ÎØíÑÉ ÊáæÍ Ýí ÃÝÞ ÇáÃÞØÇÑ ÇáÎáíÌíÉ¡ æÊäÐÑ ÈæÞæÚ ßÇÑËÉ ÍÞíÞíÉ áÇ ÊÎØÑ Úáì ÈÇá ÇáÌä ÇáÃÒÑÞ¡ Ýßá ÇáãÄÔÑÇÊ ÇáÊí ÓäÓÊÚÑÖåÇ åäÇ ÊæÍí ÈÃä ãÕíÑäÇ Óíßæä ãËá ãÕíÑ ÞÈÇÆá ÇáãæåíßÇäÒ Ýí ÇáÔãÇá ÇáßäÏí¡ Ãæ ãËá ãÕíÑ ÞÈÇÆá ÇáãÇíÇ¡ ÇáÐíä ÊÚÑÖæÇ ááÝäÇÁ Ýí ÛÇÈÇÊ ÇáÃãÇÒæä ÈÍÑÇÈ ÇáÚÕÇÈÇÊ ÇáÅÓÈÇäíÉ ÇáÇÓÊßÔÇÝíÉ¡ ÇáÊí ãäÍÊ äÝÓåÇ ÍÞ ÇÓÊÈÇÍÉ ÏãÇÁ ÇáåäæÏ ÇáÍãÑ¡ ÇáÓßÇä ÇáÃÕáííä¡ ÍÊì ßÇÏÊ ÊÝäíåã Úä ÈßÑÉ ÃÈíåã¡ æÕÇÑÊ ÃÑÖåã ãáßÇð ÕÑÝÇð ááãÌÇãíÚ ÇáÃæÑÈíÉ ÇáåãÌíÉ ÇáÒÇÍÝÉ äÍæ ÇáÞÇÑÉ ÇáÌÏíÏÉ¡ ÈÔÞíåÇ ÇáÔãÇáí (ÃãÑíßÇ ÇáÔãÇáíÉ¡ æÇáÌäæÈí (ÃãÑíßÇ ÇáÌäæÈíÉ).

ÑÈãÇ ßÇäÊ ÇáßÇÊÈÉ ÇáÇÓÊÞÕÇÆíÉ (ÊÇäíÇ ÍÓæ) Ãæá ÇáãÊäÈÆíä ÈæÞæÚ ÍÞæá ÇáäÝØ ÇáÎáíÌíÉ Èíä ãÎÇáÈ ÇáÈäÊÇÛæä¡ ÝÞÏ ÃÕÇÈÊ ßÈÏ ÇáÍÞíÞÉ Ýí ãÞÇáÊåÇ ÇáÊÍáíáíÉ¡ ÇáÊí ßÊÈÊåÇ Ýí ÇáËÇäí ÚÔÑ ãä ÊãæÒ (íæáíæ) 2004¡ ÊÍÊ ÚäæÇä (ÇáÎØØ ÇáÃãÑíßíÉ áÇÍÊáÇá ÇáÓÚæÏíÉ)¡ æäÔÑÊåÇ Ýí ÕÍíÝÉ (æÒÏæã ÝäÏ)¡ ÚäÏãÇ ÔÈåÊ ÓæÇÍáäÇ ÇáÎáíÌíÉ ÈÎÇÑØÉ (ÇáÃáÏæÑÇÏæ ÇáÌÏíÏÉ)¡ ÈãÚäì Ãä ÓæÇÍáäÇ ÇáÛäíÉ ÈÇáäÝØ æÇáÛÇÒ. ÈÇÊÊ ãÑÔÍÉ ÃßËÑ ãä Ãí æÞÊ ãÖì ááÊÞÓíã æÇáÖíÇÚ ÈÃÏæÇÊ ÇáÈäÊÇÛæä¡ ãËáãÇ ÓÞØÊ ÍÖÇÑÉ ÇáÃáÏæÑÇÏæ (ããáßÉ ÇáÐåÈ) ÈÃÏæÇÊ ÇáÃÑãÇÏÇ ÇáÃÓÈÇäíÉ. (ÑÇÌÚ ãÞÇáÉ ÊÇäíÇ Ýí ÇáÃÓÝá)

áÞÏ ÇäÊÔÑÊ ÞØÚ ÇáÃÓØæá ÇáÃãÑíßí ÈÝÑÞÇØÇÊåÇ æÍÇãáÇÊåÇ æÛæÇÕÇÊåÇ æÈæÇÑÌåÇ¡ Ýí Øæá ÇáÎáíÌ ÇáÚÑÈí æÚÑÖå¡ ÝÊãÏÏÊ ãä ãÏÎá ÔØ ÇáÚÑÈ ÍÊì ãÖíÞ åÑãÒ¡ æãä ãÖíÞ åÑãÒ ÍÊì ãÖíÞ ÈÇÈ ÇáãäÏÈ¡ æãä ãÖíÞ ÈÇÈ ÇáãäÏÈ¡ ÍÊì ãÖÇíÞ ÊíÑÇä æÇáÓæíÓ¡ æÕÇÑÊ åí ÇáÊí ÊõÎÖÚ äÇÞáÇÊ ÇáäÝØ æÇáÓÝä ÇáÊÌÇÑíÉ ááÊÝÊíÔ ÇáÞÓÑí Ýí ÚÑÖ ÇáÈÍÑ¡ æåí ÇáÊí ÊÓÊÌæÈåÇ ÚäÏ ãÞÊÑÈÇÊ ÇáãæÇäÆ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ¡ æÊÈÓØ äÝæÐåÇ Úáì ÇáãÓÇáß ÇáãáÇÍíÉ ÇáãÄÏíÉ ÅáíåÇ¡ æÊæÓÚÊ ÞæÇÚÏåÇ ÇáÍÑÈíÉ Ýí ÎØæØ ÇáÊãÇÓ ÇáÈÑíÉ¡ ÍÊì ÝÇÞ ÊÚÏÇÏåÇ ÊÚÏÇÏ ÇáÌíæÔ ÇáÛÇÒíÉ Ýí ßá ÇáÍÑæÈ æÇáãÚÇÑß ÇáÞÏíãÉ æÇáÍÏíËÉ.

áÞÏ ßÔÝ åäÑí ßíÓäÌÑ Úä ÊÝÇÕíá ÎØÊå¡ ÇáÊí äÔÑåÇ Úáì ÕÝÍÇÊ ãÌáÉ (åÇÑÈÑ) ÈÇÓãå ÇáãÓÊÚÇÑ (ÇáÌäÏí ÇáÛÇãÖ)¡ æÇáÊí ÊÖãäÊ ÇÍÊáÇá ÍÞæá ÇáäÝØ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ ãä ÑÃÓ ÇáÈíÔÉ Åáì ÑÃÓ ÇáÎíãÉ¡ æÊÖãäÊ ÃíÖÇð ÇáÇÓÊÚÇäÉ ÈÎÈÑÇÁ äÝØííä ãä ÊßÓÇÓ æÃæßáÇåæãÇ áÅÏÇÑÉ ÍÞæá ÇáäÝØ æÇáÛÇÒ¡ æØÑÏ ÇáÓßÇä ÇáÃÕáííä ãä ÏíÇÑåã¡ Ãæ ÅÌÈÇÑåã Úáì ÇáÚíÔ Èíä ßËÈÇä ÇáÕÍÑÇÁ.

æÑÏÊ åÐå ÇáÃÝßÇÑ ÇáÔíØÇäíÉ Ýí ÏÑÇÓÉ ÃÚÏåÇ ãÑßÒ ÇáÏÑÇÓÇÊ ÇáÚáíÇ ÈÌÇãÚÉ åÇÑÝÇÑÏ¡ ÊÖãäÊ ÇáÓÈá ÇáßÝíáÉ ááÓíØÑÉ Úáì ÇáäÝØ ÇáÚÇáãí¡ æßÇä ãä ÇáØÈíÚí Ãä ÊÓÚì ÃãÑíßÇ ãäÐ ÓÈÚíäíÇÊ ÇáÞÑä ÇáãÇÖí ÚäÏãÇ ÃÚáäÊ Úä æÞÝ ÇáÊÚÇãá ÈäÙÇã ÇáäÞÏ ÇáÏæáí¡ æÃæÞÝÊ ÊÈÏíá ÇáÏæáÇÑ ÈÇáÐåÈ¡ ÝßÓÑÊ ÇÊÝÇÞíÉ ÈÑíÊæä ææÏÒ¡ æÎÑÞÊ ÇáÇÊÝÇÞÇÊ ÇáÏæáíÉ ÇáãÚÞæÏÉ ÈíäåÇ æÈíä ÍáíÝÇÊåÇ ãä ÇáÏæá ÇáÛäíÉ¡ æÃÕíÈ ÚÇáã ÇáãÇá ÈÐåæá ÔÏíÏ ÌÑÇÁ åÐÇ ÇáÞÑÇÑ¡ ÇáÐí ÃÈÚÏ ÇáÐåÈ ßáíÇð Úä ÓÇÍÉ ÇáÊÚÇãá ÇáäÞÏí¡ æÃÞÑ ÇáäÝØ áíßæä Úáì ÞãÉ ÇáÇÞÊÕÇÏ ÇáÏæáí ãä ßÇÝÉ ÇáæÌæå. ÝÃÕÈÍ ÇáäÝØ ÇáÚÑÈí åæ ÇáÛØÇÁ ÇáÍÞíÞí ááÏæáÇÑ¡ æåæ ÇáÓÑ ÇáãÚÈÑ Úä ÞæÉ ÅãÈÑÇØæÑíÊåÇ¡ æÈÇáÊÇáí ÝÃä ÇáÍÑæÈ ÇáäÝØíÉ ÇáÊí ÎÇÖÊåÇ ÃãÑíßÇ Ýí ÍæÖ ÇáÎáíÌ ÇáÚÑÈí¡ Ãæ ÇáÊí ßÇäÊ ØÑÝÇð ÝíåÇ¡ áã Êßä ãä ÈÇÈ ÇáÕÏÝÉ.

áÞÏ ÈÏÃÊ ÃãÑíßÇ ÈÇÍÊáÇá ÇáÚÑÇÞ æÃÝÛÇäÓÊÇä¡ æäÔÑÊ ÞæÇÚÏåÇ ÇáÍÑÈíÉ Ýí ÞáÈ ÇáÎáíÌ ÇáÚÑÈí (Ýí ÞØÑ)¡ æÕÇÑÊ åí ÇáÊí ÊãÇÑÓ ÇáÅÑåÇÈ ÈÐÑíÚÉ ãßÇÝÍÉ ÇáÅÑåÇÈ¡ Ëã ÓÇÑÚÊ Åáì ÊÚÒíÒ ÞæÉ ÇáÇäÊÔÇÑ ÇáÓÑíÚ (Ýí ÝáæÑíÏÇ)¡ æåí ÇáÞæÉ ÇáããíÒÉ ÈÃáæÇäåÇ ÇáÕÍÑÇæíÉ¡ æÇáãÏÑÈÉ ááÊÏÎá ÇáÓÑíÚ Ýí ÈáÏÇääÇ ÇáÎáíÌíÉ¡ æÇáÊí ÊÚÑÝ ÇáÂä ÈÇÓã ãÑßÒ ÇáÞíÇÏÉ ÇáæÓØì¡ æíÎÊÕÑæäåÇ ÈßáãÉ (ÓäÊßæã)¡ æãÇ ÃÏÑÇß ãÇ ÓäÊßæã ¿.

æÇááå íÓÊÑ ãä ÇáÌÇíÇÊ

U.S. Plans for Occupation of Saudi Arabia

Michael Moore, Richard Perle join forces

by Tanya Hsu

In spite of its progressive producer and target audience, Fahrenheit 9/11 falls in lockstep with the agenda of neoconservative hawks: rid Arabia of the House of Saud, thereby granting the U.S. and allies full access to the Middle East's biggest prize.

There is a growing belief on the part of members Congress, diplomats, and the American public that the Bush administration is executing a "turnaround" in U.S. policy toward the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia because of neoconservative and interest group pressure. . . .

The U.S. has not had wholly "friendly" intentions toward the Kingdom for the past 30 years. Any appearance of such is only the visible veneer of real U.S. military policy. Declassified documents reveal that there has been a constant drumbeat behind closed doors to invade Saudi Arabia. The Pentagon has, for three decades, formulated and updated secret plans to seize Saudi oil wells and rid the Kingdom of the ruling House of Saud. This is not only a neoconservative cabal. Time and again, plans have been made for an invasion of Saudi Arabia for a larger purpose: U.S. control of Middle Eastern oil, with all the political power that would entail.

The most recent wave of charges that Saudi Arabia supports and/or condones terrorism signifies a secondary and more public attempt to gain support for a thirty-year-old plan to occupy Saudi Arabia. Other regional players' objectives (such as "securing" oil supplies, or "fighting terror") may create an unstoppable impetus for an American invasion.

Classified Plans Brought to Light

In 1973, the Nixon administration described a plan of attack against Saudi Arabia to seize its oil fields in a classified Joint Intelligence Report entitled "UK Eyes Alpha." British MI5 and MI6 were informed, and under British National Archive rules, the document was declassified in Dec. 2003. The oil embargo had been over for only three weeks but "Eyes Alpha" suggested that the "U.S. could guarantee sufficient oil supplies for themselves and their allies by taking the oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the Gulf State of Abu Dhabi." It followed that "preemptive" action would be considered, and that two brigades could seize the Saudi oilfields and one brigade each could take Kuwait and Abu Dhabi.

In Feb. 1975 the London Sunday Times revealed information from a leaked and classified U.S. Department of Defense plan. The plan was code-named "Dhahran Option Four" and provided for an invasion of the world's largest oil reserves, namely Saudi Arabia. . . .

Also in 1975, Robert Tucker, U.S. intelligence and military analyst, wrote an article for Commentary magazine, owned by the Jewish American Committee, entitled "Oil: The Issue of American Intervention." Tucker stated that, "Without intervention there is a distinct possibility of an economic and political disaster bearing . . . resemblance to the disaster of 1930s. . . . The Arab shoreline of the Gulf is a new El Dorado waiting for its conquistadors." And this was followed in February of the same year by an article in Harper's magazine by a Pentagon analyst using a pseudonym, Miles Ignotus, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to seize Saudi oilfields, installations and airports, entitled "Seizing Arab Oil." According to James Akins, former U.S. diplomat, the author was probably Henry Kissinger, secretary of state at the time. Kissinger has neither confirmed nor denied the charge.

Further, in Aug. 1975, a report entitled, "Oil Fields as Military Objectives: A Feasibility Study," was produced for the Committee on Foreign Relations. This report stated that potential targets for the U.S. included Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Venezuela, Libya and Nigeria. "Analysis indicates . . . [that military forces of OPEC countries were] quantitatively and qualitatively inferior [and] could be swiftly crushed."

The real premise of an attack against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has been around since the Cold War. The idea was, however, revived under the aegis of a new "war against terrorism" on the charge of that the Saudi state supported strikes against the west. One nexus of this drive is Richard Perle.



Advertise on Sotaliraq.com? Click here for more information!

Copyright © 1998-2017 Sotaliraq.com - All rights reserved / جميـــع حقـوق الطبع والنشر محفوظة لصوت العراق
Home | News & Reports | Articles | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Google